Discussion
helps you to understand a concept better than thinking it one’s own self. I
always like to study science with historical continuity which helps me to think
in a different way. I got new friends in that journey of different way of
scientific discussion. Giving and sharing improved my understanding of physics
in a way completely different from text books.
First I want to talk about the very basic Newton’s three
laws.
Law means an abstract from
the Nature. You cannot prove it but you can just observe. We don’t know the
answer of why to these laws. It is given by the Nature to deduce the Nature.
A law is something that is followed by Nature itself. And
Newton gave us three laws that tell about the movement of objects in real life.
Newton’s first law states
that,
Every object in the universe continues to be in same
state of rest or uniform motion until it is acted upon by an external force.
And the second law states
that,
The net external force acting on an object is proportional
to change in momentum of that object.
p – momentum = m*v
m – mass
v – velocity
Fext = dp /dt
Don’t you think there is a
waste here?
The second law itself is going to give information about
the first law as follows,
When Fext = 0 it implies
p – momentum is a constant.
If mass is constant
then “v – velocity” is also a const. The second law itself gives that when
there is no net external force acting on a body, the velocity of the object is
going to be constant. The constant can be either zero or some finite velocity.
Then
why do we need the first law as a separate statement?
Scientist never waste time
by writing same thing in two different ways since science is the method of
minimum laws. You can suspect the first law but the answer we know.
It
has to be something different kind of information should be there in the first
law.
Let
see what it can be?
The answer is there in
your bus travel. When you travel in bus near the window seat in constant
velocity, you can see through the window, how trees, houses looks moving at
constant velocity.
Let
assume that the bus window is too small so that you can only see through small
holes. You can’t realize whether the bus is moving or the trees are moving.
When
you suddenly stop, you can see trees and houses and all the things stops
moving.
With
respect to your point of vision, you see all things came to a
sudden halt or stop. But
there is no force acting on those things. Then how did these came to a halt.
If Nature follows only the second rule, then
Fext = 0 then
Velocity should be a constant. But here velocity is changing but without any external
force. Does it mean Nature don’t follow Newton's second law?
But Newton is very clever.
He solved this by simply arguing that, “It is second law. Nature should follow
also the first law then only second law would be valid”.
First law says that “No object would change its velocity by
itself but will change only when it is acted by net external force”.
Nature should follow this rule. So Newton formulated a new
force called “Pseudo force”.
Pseudo
forces are the forces made to explain non inertial reference frames.
He
explained that Pseudo force made the trees and house and all the things to stop
instantaneously.
Now you can apply the second law to Pseudo force and it is
perfectly applicable.
Pseudo forces are not only present in the trees and outer
environment but also in your bus. If there is an object with low friction with
surface is there in your bus, when you accelerate you can see the object moves
in the opposite direction to the acceleration. And this was explained by Pseudo
forces.
Thus we understood the importance of the first law in
Newton’s laws of motion.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let everyone know what you think about this