Yesterday
I watched some of the videos of Walter Lewin lectures on Electricity and
Magnetism. He is really amazing especially when he is doing experiments. Thought
the concepts are a familiar one it gave me a good time pass. I spend a little
time on thinking about Electrostatics.
We
need to know that Electric field lines are not real. It is just a simple
representation invented by Michael Faraday to visualize Electric field. We
should not simply accept it as the real fact.
Electric
flux is the measure of the number of field lines passing through the surface
that is chosen. But it is not the number of the absolute number of field lines.
The
electric flux “ϕ” over a surface S is therefore given by the surface
integral:
ϕ
= ∬ E. ds
s
where “E” is
the electric field and “ds” is a differential area on the surface S with
the normally outward facing direction.
And
the electric flux around the closed surface “S” is given by:
ϕ
= ∯ E. ds = q / ϵ
But
be careful that it is not absolute that, there is exactly
“q / ϵ” electric flux
around a point charge “q” [In SI unit system].
Electric
flux is not really the measurement of the number of field lines around a
charge. It is just a calculating tool of Electric strength on the basis of
proportionality arguments.
We
know that we can draw infinitely many electric field lines as much as we want.
But for the sake of simplicity in our calculations, we can’t use “infinite” as
a number.
[Note: We need to be very
careful that “∞” is not a number. It is just a symbol given for concepts.
It
is like instead of saying “Newton’s Laws of Motion”, if I made a code “£” in a book,
it says that where ever I use the symbol “£” it really means “Newton’s laws of
Motion”.
In
the same manner, the symbol “∞” is also used just to represent a Mathematical
and Physical concept. The “∞” symbol just says that “it gets bigger and bigger
where there is no end”. Simply it means “no limit or end”.]
So
we made a proportionality factor that is related with the number of field
lines. Though the number of lines is infinite it is a proportional and dependent
quantity.
It
was defined the Electric flux as it is proportional to the number of field
lines.
It
is already known from the definition that charge “q” is also proportional to
the number of field lines.
Therefore
we made calculations from the conclusion; Electric flux is proportional to “q”
It
is first formulated by Carl Freidrich Gauss that is
The net outward normal electric flux through any closed surface is
proportional to the total electric charge enclosed within that closed surface.
If
the number of field lines was found out to be increasing that implies the
charge “q” inside the closed surface is increased.
In
SI units the proportionality constant is taken to be “1/ϵ” and so the electric
flux